DGT vs VXUS

Quick Verdict

VXUS has a lower expense ratio. DGT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7860 holdings.

Lower Fees: VXUSHigher Returns: DGTMore Diversified: VXUS

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricDGTVXUSWinner
Expense Ratio0.50%0.05%
AUM$608M$156.5B
Dividend Yield2.52%2.60%
Holdings1788,747
YTD Return+15.28%+13.65%
1Y Return+30.20%+28.53%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.15%+18.64%
5Y Return (annualized)+14.38%+9.00%
Volatility (annualized)15.5%15.1%
Max Drawdown-58.3%-39.9%
Fund FamilyState Street Investment ManagementVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionSep 25, 2000Jan 26, 2011

DGT vs VXUS Performance

State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DGT returned +30.20% while VXUS returned +28.53%. Year to date, DGT is up 15.28% versus a gain of 13.65% for VXUS.

Over three years, DGT compounded at +21.15% per year against +18.64% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +14.38% and +9.00% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.81% annualized vs +3.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

DGT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -58.3% for DGT and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

DGT charges 0.50% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $5 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DGT currently yields 2.52% against 2.60% for VXUS.

Holdings Overlap

8.8%overlap

DGT and VXUS share 40 holdings out of 7976 unique holdings combined, representing a 8.8% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in DGTWeight in VXUSDifference
HSBA:LN0.81%0.72%0.09%
NOVN:SM0.69%0.73%0.04%
AZN:LN0.65%0.71%0.06%
RY:CAProProPro
SANB11:BVProProPro
ABBN:SMProProPro
MT:LUProProPro
RIO:LNProProPro
BBVA:MAProProPro
UBSG:SMProProPro
See all 10 holdings DGT shares with VXUS
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DGT or VXUS?

DGT has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $45 per year of difference.

Which performed better, DGT or VXUS?

Over the past year DGT returned +30.20% vs +28.53% for VXUS, so DGT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), DGT annualized +3.77% vs +4.81% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, DGT or VXUS?

DGT has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: DGT -58.3% vs VXUS -39.9%.

Should I hold both DGT and VXUS?

DGT and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between DGT and VXUS?

DGT and VXUS share 40 common holdings with a 8.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7976 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, DGT or VXUS?

DGT yields 2.52% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →