DFAC vs IVV

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. DFAC delivered stronger 1-year returns. DFAC offers more diversification with 2495 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: DFACMore Diversified: DFAC

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricDFACIVVWinner
Expense Ratio0.17%0.03%
AUM$47.6B$865.2B
Dividend Yield0.91%1.09%
Holdings2,519508
YTD Return+15.22%+13.13%
1Y Return+25.76%+22.90%
3Y Return (annualized)+19.23%+21.08%
5Y Return (annualized)+12.17%+13.27%
Volatility (annualized)15.8%15.1%
Max Drawdown-23.1%-56.5%
Fund FamilyDimensionaliShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionOct 4, 2007May 15, 2000

DFAC vs IVV Performance

Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) is a ETF from Dimensional and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DFAC returned +25.76% while IVV returned +22.90%. Year to date, DFAC is up 15.22% versus a gain of 13.13% for IVV.

Over three years, DFAC compounded at +19.23% per year against +21.08% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +12.17% and +13.27% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, DFAC has the edge at +12.35% annualized vs +7.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

DFAC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.1% for DFAC and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

DFAC charges 0.17% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $17 vs $3 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DFAC currently yields 0.91% against 1.09% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

64.1%overlap

DFAC and IVV share 465 holdings out of 2535 unique holdings combined, representing a 64.1% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in DFACWeight in IVVDifference
NVDA5.36%7.76%2.40%
AAPL4.79%7.44%2.65%
MSFT3.83%4.57%0.74%
AMZNProProPro
GOOGProProPro
METAProProPro
AVGOProProPro
JPM:USProProPro
LLYProProPro
MUProProPro
See all 10 holdings DFAC shares with IVV
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DFAC or IVV?

DFAC has an expense ratio of 0.17% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $14 per year of difference.

Which performed better, DFAC or IVV?

Over the past year DFAC returned +25.76% vs +22.90% for IVV, so DFAC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), DFAC annualized +12.35% vs +7.02% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, DFAC or IVV?

DFAC has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: DFAC -23.1% vs IVV -56.5%.

Should I hold both DFAC and IVV?

DFAC and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between DFAC and IVV?

DFAC and IVV share 465 common holdings with a 64.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2535 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, DFAC or IVV?

DFAC yields 0.91% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →