DABS vs IVV
DABS vs IVV
DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DABS | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $149M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.86% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 126 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +1.30% | +11.54% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.50% | +21.48% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.86% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.02% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -1.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | DoubleLine Funds | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 28, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
DABS vs IVV Performance
DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS) is a ETF from DoubleLine Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DABS returned +3.50% while IVV returned +21.48%. Year to date, DABS is up 1.30% versus a gain of 11.54% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 1.8% for DABS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.5% for DABS and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.37. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DABS charges 0.40% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DABS currently yields 4.86% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
DABS and IVV share 0 holdings out of 535 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DABS or IVV?
DABS has an expense ratio of 0.40% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $37 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DABS or IVV?
Over the past year DABS returned +3.50% vs +21.48% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), DABS annualized +4.78% vs +6.97% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DABS or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 1.8% for DABS. Worst drawdown: DABS -1.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both DABS and IVV?
DABS and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.37, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DABS and IVV?
DABS and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 535 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DABS or IVV?
DABS yields 4.86% while IVV yields 1.09%, so DABS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.