CGGR vs IVV

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCGGRIVVWinner
Expense Ratio0.39%0.03%
AUM$23.7B$865.2B
Dividend Yield0.15%1.09%
Holdings98508
YTD Return+5.02%+13.31%
1Y Return+13.31%+24.00%
3Y Return (annualized)+22.31%+21.16%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.34%
Volatility (annualized)19.6%15.1%
Max Drawdown-28.9%-56.5%
Fund FamilyCapital Group (US)iShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionFeb 22, 2022May 15, 2000

CGGR vs IVV Performance

Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR) is a ETF from Capital Group (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CGGR returned +13.31% while IVV returned +24.00%. Year to date, CGGR is up 5.02% versus a gain of 13.31% for IVV.

Over three years, CGGR compounded at +22.31% per year against +21.16% for IVV. Across the full 4-year window we track, CGGR has the edge at +15.93% annualized vs +7.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

CGGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.9% for CGGR and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CGGR charges 0.39% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGGR currently yields 0.15% against 1.09% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

37.3%overlap

CGGR and IVV share 59 holdings out of 534 unique holdings combined, representing a 37.3% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in CGGRWeight in IVVDifference
NVDA5.16%7.76%2.60%
META7.09%2.19%4.90%
AAPL1.79%7.44%5.65%
MSFTProProPro
AVGOProProPro
TSLAProProPro
MUProProPro
AMZNProProPro
GOOGProProPro
VProProPro
See all 10 holdings CGGR shares with IVV
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CGGR or IVV?

CGGR has an expense ratio of 0.39% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.

Which performed better, CGGR or IVV?

Over the past year CGGR returned +13.31% vs +24.00% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), CGGR annualized +15.93% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, CGGR or IVV?

CGGR has been the more volatile fund at 19.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: CGGR -28.9% vs IVV -56.5%.

Should I hold both CGGR and IVV?

CGGR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between CGGR and IVV?

CGGR and IVV share 59 common holdings with a 37.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 534 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, CGGR or IVV?

CGGR yields 0.15% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →