CFA vs QQQ

Quick Verdict

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. CFA offers more diversification with 499 holdings.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: QQQMore Diversified: CFA

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCFAQQQWinner
Expense Ratio0.35%0.18%
AUM$537M$455.8B
Dividend Yield1.23%0.41%
Holdings502108
YTD Return+11.88%+17.27%
1Y Return+16.45%+28.64%
3Y Return (annualized)+13.54%+24.88%
5Y Return (annualized)+8.26%+14.86%
Volatility (annualized)14.9%30.6%
Max Drawdown-37.9%-83.0%
Fund FamilyVictory Capital Management Inc.Invesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJul 1, 2014Mar 10, 1999

CFA vs QQQ Performance

VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF (CFA) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year CFA returned +16.45% while QQQ returned +28.64%. Year to date, CFA is up 11.88% versus a gain of 17.27% for QQQ.

Over three years, CFA compounded at +13.54% per year against +24.88% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +8.26% and +14.86% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.08% annualized vs +9.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 14.9% for CFA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.9% for CFA and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CFA charges 0.35% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $18 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CFA currently yields 1.23% against 0.41% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

15.1%overlap

CFA and QQQ share 79 holdings out of 523 unique holdings combined, representing a 15.1% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in CFAWeight in QQQDifference
NVDA0.18%7.88%7.70%
AAPL0.31%7.46%7.15%
MSFT0.23%4.65%4.42%
MUProProPro
AMZNProProPro
AMDProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
METAProProPro
TSLAProProPro
AVGOProProPro
See all 10 holdings CFA shares with QQQ
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CFA or QQQ?

CFA has an expense ratio of 0.35% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.

Which performed better, CFA or QQQ?

Over the past year CFA returned +16.45% vs +28.64% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), CFA annualized +9.90% vs +13.08% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, CFA or QQQ?

QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 14.9% for CFA. Worst drawdown: CFA -37.9% vs QQQ -83.0%.

Should I hold both CFA and QQQ?

CFA and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between CFA and QQQ?

CFA and QQQ share 79 common holdings with a 15.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 523 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, CFA or QQQ?

CFA yields 1.23% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so CFA currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →