BSV vs VYM

Quick Verdict

BSV has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. BSV offers more diversification with 2787 holdings.

Lower Fees: BSVHigher Returns: VYMMore Diversified: BSV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBSVVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.04%
AUM$44.8B$79.0B
Dividend Yield3.98%2.86%
Holdings3,125568
YTD Return+0.40%+15.45%
1Y Return+2.33%+26.05%
3Y Return (annualized)+4.31%+17.96%
5Y Return (annualized)+1.55%+12.54%
Volatility (annualized)2.4%14.6%
Max Drawdown-9.0%-58.8%
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
InceptionApr 3, 2007Nov 10, 2006

BSV vs VYM Performance

Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF (BSV) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BSV returned +2.33% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, BSV is up 0.40% versus a gain of 15.45% for VYM.

Over three years, BSV compounded at +4.31% per year against +17.96% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +1.55% and +12.54% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.06% annualized vs +0.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 2.4% for BSV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.0% for BSV and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.16. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BSV charges 0.03% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $4 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSV currently yields 3.98% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

0.0%overlap

BSV and VYM share 7 holdings out of 3338 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BSVWeight in VYMDifference
DUK0.00%0.45%0.45%
AFL0.01%0.24%0.23%
KDP0.01%0.17%0.16%
KVUEProProPro
BWAProProPro
SFProProPro
GMTProProPro
See all 7 holdings BSV shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BSV or VYM?

BSV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VYM charges 0.04%. BSV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $1 per year of difference.

Which performed better, BSV or VYM?

Over the past year BSV returned +2.33% vs +26.05% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), BSV annualized +0.91% vs +7.06% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, BSV or VYM?

VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 2.4% for BSV. Worst drawdown: BSV -9.0% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both BSV and VYM?

BSV and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.16, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between BSV and VYM?

BSV and VYM share 7 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3338 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, BSV or VYM?

BSV yields 3.98% while VYM yields 2.86%, so BSV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →