BNDS vs IVV
BNDS vs IVV
Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BNDS | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.88% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $94M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.71% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 77 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +4.44% | +13.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.51% | +23.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.26% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.52% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -7.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | InfraCap | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 15, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
BNDS vs IVV Performance
Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF (BNDS) is a ETF from InfraCap and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BNDS returned +9.51% while IVV returned +23.63%. Year to date, BNDS is up 4.44% versus a gain of 13.52% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 5.2% for BNDS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -7.0% for BNDS and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BNDS charges 0.88% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $88 vs $3 annually, a gap of $85 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BNDS currently yields 8.71% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BNDS and IVV share 1 holdings out of 574 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BNDS | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GM | 2.30% | 0.11% | 2.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BNDS or IVV?
BNDS has an expense ratio of 0.88% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $85 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BNDS or IVV?
Over the past year BNDS returned +9.51% vs +23.63% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BNDS annualized +8.43% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BNDS or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 5.2% for BNDS. Worst drawdown: BNDS -7.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BNDS and IVV?
BNDS and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BNDS and IVV?
BNDS and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 574 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BNDS or IVV?
BNDS yields 8.71% while IVV yields 1.09%, so BNDS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.