BKLC vs VYM

Quick Verdict

BKLC has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: BKLCHigher Returns: VYMMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBKLCVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.00%0.04%
AUM$5.4B$79.0B
Dividend Yield0.34%2.86%
Holdings509568
YTD Return-62.34%+15.20%
1Y Return-59.14%+25.56%
3Y Return (annualized)-15.50%+17.86%
5Y Return (annualized)-8.98%+12.35%
Volatility (annualized)31.4%14.6%
Max Drawdown-68.0%-58.8%
Fund FamilyBNY Mellon Investment ManagementVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionApr 7, 2020Nov 10, 2006

BKLC vs VYM Performance

BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) is a ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BKLC returned -59.14% while VYM returned +25.56%. Year to date, BKLC is down 62.34% versus a gain of 15.20% for VYM.

Over three years, BKLC compounded at -15.50% per year against +17.86% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -8.98% and +12.35% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.05% annualized vs +0.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

BKLC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.4% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -68.0% for BKLC and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.37. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BKLC charges 0.00% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $0 vs $4 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKLC currently yields 0.34% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

34.4%overlap

BKLC and VYM share 203 holdings out of 852 unique holdings combined, representing a 34.4% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BKLCWeight in VYMDifference
AVGO2.57%6.47%3.90%
JPM:US1.41%3.36%1.95%
XOM1.21%2.83%1.62%
JNJProProPro
WMTProProPro
ABBVProProPro
PGProProPro
HDProProPro
CVXProProPro
CATProProPro
See all 10 holdings BKLC shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BKLC or VYM?

BKLC has an expense ratio of 0.00% while VYM charges 0.04%. BKLC is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $4 per year of difference.

Which performed better, BKLC or VYM?

Over the past year BKLC returned -59.14% vs +25.56% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BKLC annualized +0.14% vs +7.05% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, BKLC or VYM?

BKLC has been the more volatile fund at 31.4% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: BKLC -68.0% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both BKLC and VYM?

BKLC and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.37, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between BKLC and VYM?

BKLC and VYM share 203 common holdings with a 34.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 852 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, BKLC or VYM?

BKLC yields 0.34% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →