BKDV vs SCHD
BKDV vs SCHD
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. BKDV delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKDV | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $1.8B | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.53% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 84 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +18.41% | +23.53% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.48% | +30.95% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.72% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.56% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.0% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.5% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 1, 2024 | Oct 20, 2011 |
BKDV vs SCHD Performance
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV) is a ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year BKDV returned +31.48% while SCHD returned +30.95%. Year to date, BKDV is up 18.41% versus a gain of 23.53% for SCHD.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 12.0% for BKDV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.5% for BKDV and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKDV charges 0.60% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $6 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKDV currently yields 0.53% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
BKDV and SCHD share 6 holdings out of 176 unique holdings combined, representing a 9.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BKDV | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| UNH | 2.02% | 4.54% | 2.52% |
| TXN | 2.29% | 3.70% | 1.41% |
| VZ | 0.75% | 3.68% | 2.93% |
| BMY | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| SLB:CW | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| FITB | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 6 holdings BKDV shares with SCHD Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKDV or SCHD?
BKDV has an expense ratio of 0.60% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $54 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BKDV or SCHD?
Over the past year BKDV returned +31.48% vs +30.95% for SCHD, so BKDV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BKDV annualized +21.36% vs +11.35% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BKDV or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 12.0% for BKDV. Worst drawdown: BKDV -15.5% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both BKDV and SCHD?
BKDV and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BKDV and SCHD?
BKDV and SCHD share 6 common holdings with a 9.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 176 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKDV or SCHD?
BKDV yields 0.53% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.