BBHY vs VOO
BBHY vs VOO
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. BBHY offers more diversification with 1201 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBHY | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.07% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $620M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.41% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 1,563 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +0.02% | +13.31% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.21% | +24.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.56% | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.54% | +13.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.7% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -25.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 15, 2016 | Sep 7, 2010 |
BBHY vs VOO Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BBHY returned +3.21% while VOO returned +24.01%. Year to date, BBHY is up 0.02% versus a gain of 13.31% for VOO.
Over three years, BBHY compounded at +7.56% per year against +21.17% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +3.54% and +13.34% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.55% annualized vs +2.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 7.7% for BBHY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.3% for BBHY and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBHY charges 0.07% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $7 vs $3 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBHY currently yields 7.41% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
BBHY and VOO share 0 holdings out of 1706 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBHY or VOO?
BBHY has an expense ratio of 0.07% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $4 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBHY or VOO?
Over the past year BBHY returned +3.21% vs +24.01% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), BBHY annualized +2.35% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBHY or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 7.7% for BBHY. Worst drawdown: BBHY -25.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both BBHY and VOO?
BBHY and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BBHY and VOO?
BBHY and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1706 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBHY or VOO?
BBHY yields 7.41% while VOO yields 1.09%, so BBHY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.