AGG vs TLT

Quick Verdict

AGG has a lower expense ratio. AGG delivered stronger 1-year returns. AGG offers more diversification with 1959 holdings.

Lower Fees: AGGHigher Returns: AGGMore Diversified: AGG

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAGGTLTWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.15%
AUM$137.7B$43.0B
Dividend Yield3.97%4.53%
Holdings13,26948
YTD Return-0.53%-3.35%
1Y Return+2.71%-1.06%
3Y Return (annualized)+3.96%-1.44%
5Y Return (annualized)-0.44%-8.15%
Volatility (annualized)4.4%13.4%
Max Drawdown-18.4%-48.7%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)iShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeFixed Income
InceptionSep 22, 2003Jul 22, 2002

AGG vs TLT Performance

iShares Core US Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year AGG returned +2.71% while TLT returned -1.06%. Year to date, AGG is down 0.53% versus a loss of 3.35% for TLT.

Over three years, AGG compounded at +3.96% per year against -1.44% for TLT; over five years the annualized figures are -0.44% and -8.15% respectively. Across the full 23-year window we track, AGG has the edge at +3.01% annualized vs +0.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

TLT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.4% compared with 4.4% for AGG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.4% for AGG and -48.7% for TLT. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AGG charges 0.03% per year while TLT charges 0.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $15 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AGG currently yields 3.97% against 4.53% for TLT.

Holdings Overlap

0.5%overlap

AGG and TLT share 6 holdings out of 1997 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.5% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AGGWeight in TLTDifference
T 1.875 11/15/510.15%4.54%4.39%
T 4 11/15/520.15%3.71%3.56%
T 3 02/15/480.09%2.13%2.04%
T 3 02/15/47ProProPro
T 4.75 02/15/45ProProPro
T 3.125 08/15/44ProProPro
See all 6 holdings AGG shares with TLT
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AGG or TLT?

AGG has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TLT charges 0.15%. AGG is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.

Which performed better, AGG or TLT?

Over the past year AGG returned +2.71% vs -1.06% for TLT, so AGG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (23 years), AGG annualized +3.01% vs +0.79% for TLT. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, AGG or TLT?

TLT has been the more volatile fund at 13.4% annualized versus 4.4% for AGG. Worst drawdown: AGG -18.4% vs TLT -48.7%.

Should I hold both AGG and TLT?

AGG and TLT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between AGG and TLT?

AGG and TLT share 6 common holdings with a 0.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1997 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, AGG or TLT?

AGG yields 3.97% while TLT yields 4.53%, so TLT currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →