AGG vs SCHZ

Quick Verdict

AGG delivered stronger 1-year returns. AGG offers more diversification with 1959 holdings.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: AGGMore Diversified: AGG

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAGGSCHZWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.03%
AUM$137.7B$10.5B
Dividend Yield3.97%4.10%
Holdings13,26911,809
YTD Return-0.65%-0.71%
1Y Return+1.64%+1.60%
3Y Return (annualized)+3.95%+3.77%
5Y Return (annualized)-0.47%-0.60%
Volatility (annualized)4.4%4.5%
Max Drawdown-18.4%-19.7%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Charles Schwab Asset Management
CategoryFixed IncomeFixed Income
InceptionSep 22, 2003Jul 14, 2011

AGG vs SCHZ Performance

iShares Core US Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Schwab US Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year AGG returned +1.64% while SCHZ returned +1.60%. Year to date, AGG is down 0.65% versus a loss of 0.71% for SCHZ.

Over three years, AGG compounded at +3.95% per year against +3.77% for SCHZ; over five years the annualized figures are -0.47% and -0.60% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, AGG has the edge at +3.00% annualized vs +0.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

SCHZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 4.5% compared with 4.4% for AGG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.4% for AGG and -19.7% for SCHZ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AGG charges 0.03% per year while SCHZ charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $3 annually. On income, AGG currently yields 3.97% against 4.10% for SCHZ.

Holdings Overlap

0.7%overlap

AGG and SCHZ share 107 holdings out of 2548 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.7% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AGGWeight in SCHZDifference
T 4 11/15/520.15%0.16%0.01%
T 1.875 11/15/510.15%0.12%0.03%
T 3 02/15/480.09%0.09%0.00%
T 3 05/15/47ProProPro
FN CA8442ProProPro
FN MA4208ProProPro
FN FM4996ProProPro
FN MA4733ProProPro
FR SD1056ProProPro
WSTP V5.618 11/20/35ProProPro
See all 10 holdings AGG shares with SCHZ
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AGG or SCHZ?

AGG has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SCHZ charges 0.03%. They cost the same. On a $10,000 investment, that is $0 per year of difference.

Which performed better, AGG or SCHZ?

Over the past year AGG returned +1.64% vs +1.60% for SCHZ, so AGG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), AGG annualized +3.00% vs +0.53% for SCHZ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, AGG or SCHZ?

SCHZ has been the more volatile fund at 4.5% annualized versus 4.4% for AGG. Worst drawdown: AGG -18.4% vs SCHZ -19.7%.

Should I hold both AGG and SCHZ?

AGG and SCHZ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between AGG and SCHZ?

AGG and SCHZ share 107 common holdings with a 0.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2548 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, AGG or SCHZ?

AGG yields 3.97% while SCHZ yields 4.10%, so SCHZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →