ACVF vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricACVFVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.75%0.04%
AUM$151M$79.0B
Dividend Yield0.52%2.86%
Holdings388568
YTD Return+12.98%+15.20%
1Y Return+17.21%+25.56%
3Y Return (annualized)+18.13%+17.86%
5Y Return (annualized)+11.99%+12.35%
Volatility (annualized)14.9%14.6%
Max Drawdown-24.4%-58.8%
Fund FamilyACV ETFsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionOct 28, 2020Nov 10, 2006

ACVF vs VYM Performance

American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) is a ETF from ACV ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ACVF returned +17.21% while VYM returned +25.56%. Year to date, ACVF is up 12.98% versus a gain of 15.20% for VYM.

Over three years, ACVF compounded at +18.13% per year against +17.86% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +11.99% and +12.35% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, ACVF has the edge at +16.11% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

ACVF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.9% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.4% for ACVF and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ACVF charges 0.75% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $4 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACVF currently yields 0.52% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

38.4%overlap

ACVF and VYM share 171 holdings out of 770 unique holdings combined, representing a 38.4% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ACVFWeight in VYMDifference
AVGO2.43%6.47%4.04%
XOM1.98%2.83%0.85%
WMT2.21%2.44%0.23%
CSCOProProPro
HDProProPro
ABBVProProPro
CATProProPro
PGProProPro
CVXProProPro
MRKProProPro
See all 10 holdings ACVF shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ACVF or VYM?

ACVF has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $71 per year of difference.

Which performed better, ACVF or VYM?

Over the past year ACVF returned +17.21% vs +25.56% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ACVF annualized +16.11% vs +7.05% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, ACVF or VYM?

ACVF has been the more volatile fund at 14.9% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: ACVF -24.4% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both ACVF and VYM?

ACVF and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between ACVF and VYM?

ACVF and VYM share 171 common holdings with a 38.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 770 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, ACVF or VYM?

ACVF yields 0.52% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →