ACVF vs IVV

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricACVFIVVWinner
Expense Ratio0.75%0.03%
AUM$151M$865.2B
Dividend Yield0.52%1.09%
Holdings388508
YTD Return+13.00%+13.31%
1Y Return+17.86%+24.00%
3Y Return (annualized)+18.16%+21.16%
5Y Return (annualized)+12.05%+13.34%
Volatility (annualized)14.9%15.1%
Max Drawdown-24.4%-56.5%
Fund FamilyACV ETFsiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionOct 28, 2020May 15, 2000

ACVF vs IVV Performance

American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) is a ETF from ACV ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ACVF returned +17.86% while IVV returned +24.00%. Year to date, ACVF is up 13.00% versus a gain of 13.31% for IVV.

Over three years, ACVF compounded at +18.16% per year against +21.16% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +12.05% and +13.34% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, ACVF has the edge at +16.12% annualized vs +7.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.9% for ACVF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.4% for ACVF and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ACVF charges 0.75% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACVF currently yields 0.52% against 1.09% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

57.1%overlap

ACVF and IVV share 332 holdings out of 556 unique holdings combined, representing a 57.1% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ACVFWeight in IVVDifference
NVDA7.50%7.76%0.26%
MSFT4.47%4.57%0.10%
AVGO2.43%2.83%0.40%
BRK.BProProPro
CSCOProProPro
TSLAProProPro
WMTProProPro
XOMProProPro
LLYProProPro
MUProProPro
See all 10 holdings ACVF shares with IVV
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ACVF or IVV?

ACVF has an expense ratio of 0.75% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.

Which performed better, ACVF or IVV?

Over the past year ACVF returned +17.86% vs +24.00% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ACVF annualized +16.12% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, ACVF or IVV?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.9% for ACVF. Worst drawdown: ACVF -24.4% vs IVV -56.5%.

Should I hold both ACVF and IVV?

ACVF and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between ACVF and IVV?

ACVF and IVV share 332 common holdings with a 57.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 556 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, ACVF or IVV?

ACVF yields 0.52% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →