ACP vs VXUS
ACP vs VXUS
Abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7860 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACP | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 2.86% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $805M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 16.88% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 214 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +3.47% | +13.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +0.66% | +28.78% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.19% | +18.63% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.02% | +9.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -70.9% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 27, 2011 | Jan 26, 2011 |
ACP vs VXUS Performance
Abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund (ACP) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ACP returned +0.66% while VXUS returned +28.78%. Year to date, ACP is up 3.47% versus a gain of 13.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, ACP compounded at +7.19% per year against +18.63% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are -0.02% and +9.05% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.80% annualized vs -3.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ACP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.6% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -70.9% for ACP and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACP charges 2.86% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $286 vs $5 annually, a gap of $281 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACP currently yields 16.88% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
ACP and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7941 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACP or VXUS?
ACP has an expense ratio of 2.86% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $281 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ACP or VXUS?
Over the past year ACP returned +0.66% vs +28.78% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), ACP annualized -3.29% vs +4.80% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ACP or VXUS?
ACP has been the more volatile fund at 19.6% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: ACP -70.9% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both ACP and VXUS?
ACP and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ACP and VXUS?
ACP and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7941 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACP or VXUS?
ACP yields 16.88% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so ACP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.