ACP vs VOO
ACP vs VOO
Abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACP | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 2.86% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $805M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 16.88% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 214 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +2.65% | +13.31% | |
| 1Y Return | +0.03% | +24.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.90% | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.18% | +13.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.7% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -70.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 27, 2011 | Sep 7, 2010 |
ACP vs VOO Performance
Abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund (ACP) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ACP returned +0.03% while VOO returned +24.01%. Year to date, ACP is up 2.65% versus a gain of 13.31% for VOO.
Over three years, ACP compounded at +6.90% per year against +21.17% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -0.18% and +13.34% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.55% annualized vs -3.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ACP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.7% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -70.9% for ACP and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACP charges 2.86% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $286 vs $3 annually, a gap of $283 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACP currently yields 16.88% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
ACP and VOO share 0 holdings out of 586 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACP or VOO?
ACP has an expense ratio of 2.86% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $283 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ACP or VOO?
Over the past year ACP returned +0.03% vs +24.01% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), ACP annualized -3.33% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ACP or VOO?
ACP has been the more volatile fund at 19.7% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: ACP -70.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both ACP and VOO?
ACP and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ACP and VOO?
ACP and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 586 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACP or VOO?
ACP yields 16.88% while VOO yields 1.09%, so ACP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.