VYM vs XLF

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricVYMXLFWinner
Expense Ratio0.04%0.08%
AUM$79.0B$56.2B
Dividend Yield2.86%1.51%
Holdings56880
YTD Return+15.80%+5.77%
1Y Return+26.12%+13.87%
3Y Return (annualized)+18.25%+19.87%
5Y Return (annualized)+12.51%+10.61%
Volatility (annualized)14.6%21.4%
Max Drawdown-58.8%-83.8%
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)SPDR State Street Global Advisors
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionNov 10, 2006Dec 16, 1998

VYM vs XLF Performance

Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) is a ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors. Over the past year VYM returned +26.12% while XLF returned +13.87%. Year to date, VYM is up 15.80% versus a gain of 5.77% for XLF.

Over three years, VYM compounded at +18.25% per year against +19.87% for XLF; over five years the annualized figures are +12.51% and +10.61% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs +3.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

XLF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.4% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -58.8% for VYM and -83.8% for XLF. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

VYM charges 0.04% per year while XLF charges 0.08%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $8 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VYM currently yields 2.86% against 1.51% for XLF.

Holdings Overlap

16.1%overlap

VYM and XLF share 42 holdings out of 593 unique holdings combined, representing a 16.1% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in VYMWeight in XLFDifference
JPM:US3.36%11.40%8.04%
BAC1.39%4.93%3.54%
GS1.05%3.92%2.87%
WFCProProPro
MSProProPro
CProProPro
BLKProProPro
PGRProProPro
CBProProPro
PNCProProPro
See all 10 holdings VYM shares with XLF
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, VYM or XLF?

VYM has an expense ratio of 0.04% while XLF charges 0.08%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $4 per year of difference.

Which performed better, VYM or XLF?

Over the past year VYM returned +26.12% vs +13.87% for XLF, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), VYM annualized +7.07% vs +3.69% for XLF. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, VYM or XLF?

XLF has been the more volatile fund at 21.4% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: VYM -58.8% vs XLF -83.8%.

Should I hold both VYM and XLF?

VYM and XLF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between VYM and XLF?

VYM and XLF share 42 common holdings with a 16.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 593 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, VYM or XLF?

VYM yields 2.86% while XLF yields 1.51%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →