VFH vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricVFHVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.09%0.04%
AUM$12.7B$79.0B
Dividend Yield1.77%2.86%
Holdings415568
YTD Return+7.04%+15.45%
1Y Return+14.47%+26.05%
3Y Return (annualized)+20.46%+17.96%
5Y Return (annualized)+11.46%+12.54%
Volatility (annualized)20.3%14.6%
Max Drawdown-79.9%-58.8%
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJan 26, 2004Nov 10, 2006

VFH vs VYM Performance

Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VFH returned +14.47% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, VFH is up 7.04% versus a gain of 15.45% for VYM.

Over three years, VFH compounded at +20.46% per year against +17.96% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +11.46% and +12.54% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.06% annualized vs +5.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VFH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.3% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -79.9% for VFH and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

VFH charges 0.09% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $4 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VFH currently yields 1.77% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

19.0%overlap

VFH and VYM share 159 holdings out of 811 unique holdings combined, representing a 19.0% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in VFHWeight in VYMDifference
JPM9.19%3.36%5.83%
BAC4.13%1.39%2.74%
WFC2.96%1.12%1.84%
GSProProPro
MSProProPro
CProProPro
BLKProProPro
CBProProPro
PGRProProPro
CMEProProPro
See all 10 holdings VFH shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, VFH or VYM?

VFH has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $5 per year of difference.

Which performed better, VFH or VYM?

Over the past year VFH returned +14.47% vs +26.05% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), VFH annualized +5.28% vs +7.06% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, VFH or VYM?

VFH has been the more volatile fund at 20.3% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: VFH -79.9% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both VFH and VYM?

VFH and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between VFH and VYM?

VFH and VYM share 159 common holdings with a 19.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 811 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, VFH or VYM?

VFH yields 1.77% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →