SXQG vs VXUS
SXQG vs VXUS
ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SXQG | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $61M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.03% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 94 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +2.29% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.79% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.74% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.91% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.0% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | 6 Meridian ETF | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 10, 2021 | Jan 26, 2011 |
SXQG vs VXUS Performance
ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF (SXQG) is a ETF from 6 Meridian ETF and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SXQG returned +2.79% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, SXQG is up 2.29% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, SXQG compounded at +11.74% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +4.91% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, SXQG has the edge at +6.41% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SXQG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.0% for SXQG and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SXQG charges 0.55% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $5 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SXQG currently yields 0.03% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
SXQG and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7871 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SXQG or VXUS?
SXQG has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $50 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SXQG or VXUS?
Over the past year SXQG returned +2.79% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), SXQG annualized +6.41% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SXQG or VXUS?
SXQG has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: SXQG -34.0% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both SXQG and VXUS?
SXQG and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SXQG and VXUS?
SXQG and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7871 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SXQG or VXUS?
SXQG yields 0.03% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.