SFGV vs VXUS
SFGV vs VXUS
Sequoia Global Value ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7860 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SFGV | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.33% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $1.2B | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.38% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 527 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +15.36% | +13.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.21% | +28.78% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.63% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.2% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | EA Series Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 16, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
SFGV vs VXUS Performance
Sequoia Global Value ETF (SFGV) is a ETF from EA Series Trust and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SFGV returned +27.21% while VXUS returned +28.78%. Year to date, SFGV is up 15.36% versus a gain of 13.57% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 10.8% for SFGV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.2% for SFGV and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SFGV charges 0.33% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $5 annually, a gap of $28 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SFGV currently yields 2.38% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
SFGV and VXUS share 8 holdings out of 8349 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SFGV | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| VWO | 6.05% | 0.11% | 5.94% |
| KR | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.17% |
| HBAN | 0.09% | 0.05% | 0.04% |
| QSR:CA | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| SIG:LN | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| AM | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| CASH | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| CNHI:AS | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 8 holdings SFGV shares with VXUS Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SFGV or VXUS?
SFGV has an expense ratio of 0.33% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $28 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SFGV or VXUS?
Over the past year SFGV returned +27.21% vs +28.78% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), SFGV annualized +17.81% vs +4.80% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SFGV or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 10.8% for SFGV. Worst drawdown: SFGV -15.2% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both SFGV and VXUS?
SFGV and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SFGV and VXUS?
SFGV and VXUS share 8 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8349 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SFGV or VXUS?
SFGV yields 2.38% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.