SCHV vs SPY

Quick Verdict

SCHV has a lower expense ratio. SCHV delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHV offers more diversification with 557 holdings.

Lower Fees: SCHVHigher Returns: SCHVMore Diversified: SCHV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSCHVSPYWinner
Expense Ratio0.04%0.09%
AUM$15.8B$789.1B
Dividend Yield1.75%1.01%
Holdings560505
YTD Return+17.56%+13.28%
1Y Return+27.62%+23.94%
3Y Return (annualized)+17.56%+21.07%
5Y Return (annualized)+10.98%+13.27%
Volatility (annualized)14.1%15.3%
Max Drawdown-37.1%-56.5%
Fund FamilyCharles Schwab Asset ManagementState Street Investment Management
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionDec 11, 2009Jan 22, 1993

SCHV vs SPY Performance

Schwab US Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year SCHV returned +27.62% while SPY returned +23.94%. Year to date, SCHV is up 17.56% versus a gain of 13.28% for SPY.

Over three years, SCHV compounded at +17.56% per year against +21.07% for SPY; over five years the annualized figures are +10.98% and +13.27% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, SCHV has the edge at +9.69% annualized vs +8.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

SPY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.1% for SCHV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.1% for SCHV and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SCHV charges 0.04% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $9 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHV currently yields 1.75% against 1.01% for SPY.

Holdings Overlap

42.7%overlap

SCHV and SPY share 367 holdings out of 693 unique holdings combined, representing a 42.7% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in SCHVWeight in SPYDifference
MU3.29%1.71%1.58%
JPM3.00%1.40%1.60%
JNJ2.01%0.96%1.05%
XOMProProPro
INTCProProPro
WMTProProPro
ABBVProProPro
CSCOProProPro
AMATProProPro
CATProProPro
See all 10 holdings SCHV shares with SPY
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SCHV or SPY?

SCHV has an expense ratio of 0.04% while SPY charges 0.09%. SCHV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $5 per year of difference.

Which performed better, SCHV or SPY?

Over the past year SCHV returned +27.62% vs +23.94% for SPY, so SCHV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), SCHV annualized +9.69% vs +8.84% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, SCHV or SPY?

SPY has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.1% for SCHV. Worst drawdown: SCHV -37.1% vs SPY -56.5%.

Should I hold both SCHV and SPY?

SCHV and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between SCHV and SPY?

SCHV and SPY share 367 common holdings with a 42.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 693 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, SCHV or SPY?

SCHV yields 1.75% while SPY yields 1.01%, so SCHV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →