SCHJ vs VOO
SCHJ vs VOO
Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHJ | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $848M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.49% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 3,132 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +0.56% | +13.11% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.72% | +22.88% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.13% | +21.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.21% | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.4% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.6% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 10, 2019 | Sep 7, 2010 |
SCHJ vs VOO Performance
Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SCHJ returned +2.72% while VOO returned +22.88%. Year to date, SCHJ is up 0.56% versus a gain of 13.11% for VOO.
Over three years, SCHJ compounded at +5.13% per year against +21.08% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +2.21% and +13.26% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.54% annualized vs +2.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 3.4% for SCHJ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.6% for SCHJ and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHJ charges 0.03% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $3 annually. On income, SCHJ currently yields 4.49% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
SCHJ and VOO share 1 holdings out of 524 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SCHJ | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AFL | 0.03% | 0.08% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHJ or VOO?
SCHJ has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VOO charges 0.03%. They cost the same. On a $10,000 investment, that is $0 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SCHJ or VOO?
Over the past year SCHJ returned +2.72% vs +22.88% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), SCHJ annualized +2.04% vs +13.54% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SCHJ or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 3.4% for SCHJ. Worst drawdown: SCHJ -13.6% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SCHJ and VOO?
SCHJ and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SCHJ and VOO?
SCHJ and VOO share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 524 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHJ or VOO?
SCHJ yields 4.49% while VOO yields 1.09%, so SCHJ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.