SBND vs VOO
SBND vs VOO
Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. SBND offers more diversification with 836 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SBND | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $205M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.53% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 1,184 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +0.69% | +11.51% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.14% | +21.46% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.57% | +20.86% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.0% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -10.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 21, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
SBND vs VOO Performance
Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF (SBND) is a ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SBND returned +3.14% while VOO returned +21.46%. Year to date, SBND is up 0.69% versus a gain of 11.51% for VOO.
Over three years, SBND compounded at +5.57% per year against +20.86% for VOO. Across the full 5-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.44% annualized vs +2.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 4.0% for SBND. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.8% for SBND and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SBND charges 0.25% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $3 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SBND currently yields 4.53% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
SBND and VOO share 0 holdings out of 1341 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SBND or VOO?
SBND has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $22 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SBND or VOO?
Over the past year SBND returned +3.14% vs +21.46% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), SBND annualized +2.27% vs +13.44% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SBND or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 4.0% for SBND. Worst drawdown: SBND -10.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SBND and VOO?
SBND and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SBND and VOO?
SBND and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1341 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SBND or VOO?
SBND yields 4.53% while VOO yields 1.09%, so SBND currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.