QVMT vs VXUS
QVMT vs VXUS
Invesco S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. QVMT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QVMT | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.13% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $135M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.77% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 103 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +14.42% | +13.40% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.51% | +27.42% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.81% | +18.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.02% | +9.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -48.7% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 9, 2015 | Jan 26, 2011 |
QVMT vs VXUS Performance
Invesco S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF (QVMT) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QVMT returned +31.51% while VXUS returned +27.42%. Year to date, QVMT is up 14.42% versus a gain of 13.40% for VXUS.
Over three years, QVMT compounded at +17.81% per year against +18.54% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +12.02% and +9.05% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, QVMT has the edge at +10.50% annualized vs +4.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QVMT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.1% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -48.7% for QVMT and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QVMT charges 0.13% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $13 vs $5 annually, a gap of $8 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QVMT currently yields 1.77% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
QVMT and VXUS share 1 holdings out of 7961 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QVMT | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| BG | 0.18% | 0.03% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QVMT or VXUS?
QVMT has an expense ratio of 0.13% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $8 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QVMT or VXUS?
Over the past year QVMT returned +31.51% vs +27.42% for VXUS, so QVMT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), QVMT annualized +10.50% vs +4.79% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QVMT or VXUS?
QVMT has been the more volatile fund at 20.1% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: QVMT -48.7% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both QVMT and VXUS?
QVMT and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QVMT and VXUS?
QVMT and VXUS share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7961 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QVMT or VXUS?
QVMT yields 1.77% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.