QQQ vs SLNZ
QQQ vs SLNZ
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs TCW Senior Loan ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. SLNZ offers more diversification with 128 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SLNZ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.65% | |
| AUM | $455.8B | - | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.41% | 7.52% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 296 | |
| YTD Return | +16.83% | +2.12% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.58% | +3.97% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.70% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.88% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 2.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -2.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | TCW ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jun 28, 2013 |
QQQ vs SLNZ Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and TCW Senior Loan ETF (SLNZ) is a ETF from TCW ETFs. Over the past year QQQ returned +26.58% while SLNZ returned +3.97%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.83% versus a gain of 2.12% for SLNZ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 2.0% for SLNZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -2.6% for SLNZ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SLNZ charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $65 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.41% against 7.52% for SLNZ.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and SLNZ share 0 holdings out of 231 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SLNZ?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SLNZ charges 0.65%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or SLNZ?
Over the past year QQQ returned +26.58% vs +3.97% for SLNZ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QQQ annualized +13.06% vs +4.84% for SLNZ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or SLNZ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 2.0% for SLNZ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs SLNZ -2.6%.
Should I hold both QQQ and SLNZ?
QQQ and SLNZ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and SLNZ?
QQQ and SLNZ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 231 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SLNZ?
QQQ yields 0.41% while SLNZ yields 7.52%, so SLNZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.