QLV vs VOO

Quick Verdict

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOOMore Diversified: VOO

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQLVVOOWinner
Expense Ratio0.08%0.03%
AUM$163M$979.0B
Dividend Yield1.57%1.09%
Holdings118509
YTD Return+11.97%+13.80%
1Y Return+17.44%+23.71%
3Y Return (annualized)+15.88%+21.50%
5Y Return (annualized)+10.32%+13.44%
Volatility (annualized)13.7%14.1%
Max Drawdown-34.0%-34.3%
Fund FamilyFlexshares TrustVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJul 15, 2019Sep 7, 2010

QLV vs VOO Performance

FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) is a ETF from Flexshares Trust and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QLV returned +17.44% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, QLV is up 11.97% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.

Over three years, QLV compounded at +15.88% per year against +21.50% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +10.32% and +13.44% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.58% annualized vs +11.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 13.7% for QLV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.0% for QLV and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QLV charges 0.08% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $8 vs $3 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QLV currently yields 1.57% against 1.09% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

39.0%overlap

QLV and VOO share 80 holdings out of 538 unique holdings combined, representing a 39.0% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in QLVWeight in VOODifference
NVDA6.26%7.51%1.25%
AAPL5.41%6.59%1.18%
MSFT5.43%4.30%1.13%
GOOGLProProPro
JNJProProPro
AVGOProProPro
GOOGProProPro
XOMProProPro
BRK.BProProPro
METAProProPro
See all 10 holdings QLV shares with VOO
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QLV or VOO?

QLV has an expense ratio of 0.08% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $5 per year of difference.

Which performed better, QLV or VOO?

Over the past year QLV returned +17.44% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), QLV annualized +11.59% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, QLV or VOO?

VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 13.7% for QLV. Worst drawdown: QLV -34.0% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both QLV and VOO?

QLV and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between QLV and VOO?

QLV and VOO share 80 common holdings with a 39.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 538 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, QLV or VOO?

QLV yields 1.57% while VOO yields 1.09%, so QLV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →