QDVO vs VXUS
QDVO vs VXUS
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QDVO | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $719M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.37% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 57 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +10.23% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.02% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.6% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 22, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
QDVO vs VXUS Performance
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) is a ETF from Amplify ETFs and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QDVO returned +18.02% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, QDVO is up 10.23% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.9% for QDVO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.6% for QDVO and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QDVO charges 0.56% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $5 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QDVO currently yields 11.37% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
QDVO and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7901 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QDVO or VXUS?
QDVO has an expense ratio of 0.56% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $51 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QDVO or VXUS?
Over the past year QDVO returned +18.02% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QDVO annualized +21.66% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QDVO or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.9% for QDVO. Worst drawdown: QDVO -18.6% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both QDVO and VXUS?
QDVO and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QDVO and VXUS?
QDVO and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7901 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QDVO or VXUS?
QDVO yields 11.37% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so QDVO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.