QB vs VOO
QB vs VOO
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QB | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.78% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 105 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +15.53% | +13.53% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.04% | +23.65% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.52% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.1% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -3.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
QB vs VOO Performance
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF (QB) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QB returned +22.04% while VOO returned +23.65%. Year to date, QB is up 15.53% versus a gain of 13.53% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 5.1% for QB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -3.5% for QB and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QB charges 0.58% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $3 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QB currently yields 0.78% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
QB and VOO share 88 holdings out of 520 unique holdings combined, representing a 54.5% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QB | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | 7.47% | 7.51% | 0.04% |
| AAPL | 7.26% | 6.59% | 0.67% |
| MSFT | 4.54% | 4.30% | 0.24% |
| AMZN | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| MU | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| GOOGL | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| GOOG | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| AVGO | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| AMD | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| TSLA | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 10 holdings QB shares with VOO Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QB or VOO?
QB has an expense ratio of 0.58% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QB or VOO?
Over the past year QB returned +22.04% vs +23.65% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), QB annualized +19.95% vs +13.57% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QB or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 5.1% for QB. Worst drawdown: QB -3.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both QB and VOO?
QB and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QB and VOO?
QB and VOO share 88 common holdings with a 54.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 520 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QB or VOO?
QB yields 0.78% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.