ONOF vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricONOFVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.39%0.04%
AUM$137M$79.0B
Dividend Yield1.23%2.86%
Holdings506568
YTD Return+6.29%+13.24%
1Y Return+15.19%+23.76%
3Y Return (annualized)+10.83%+16.97%
5Y Return (annualized)+8.16%+12.26%
Volatility (annualized)14.2%14.6%
Max Drawdown-26.2%-58.8%
Fund FamilyGlobal X by mirae AssetVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJan 12, 2021Nov 10, 2006

ONOF vs VYM Performance

Global X Adaptive US Risk Management ETF (ONOF) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ONOF returned +15.19% while VYM returned +23.76%. Year to date, ONOF is up 6.29% versus a gain of 13.24% for VYM.

Over three years, ONOF compounded at +10.83% per year against +16.97% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +8.16% and +12.26% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, ONOF has the edge at +10.07% annualized vs +6.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 14.2% for ONOF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.2% for ONOF and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ONOF charges 0.39% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $4 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ONOF currently yields 1.23% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

29.9%overlap

ONOF and VYM share 192 holdings out of 859 unique holdings combined, representing a 29.9% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ONOFWeight in VYMDifference
AVGO3.05%6.47%3.42%
JPM1.22%3.36%2.14%
XOM0.94%2.83%1.89%
JNJProProPro
WMTProProPro
ABBVProProPro
PGProProPro
CATProProPro
HDProProPro
CSCOProProPro
See all 10 holdings ONOF shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ONOF or VYM?

ONOF has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $35 per year of difference.

Which performed better, ONOF or VYM?

Over the past year ONOF returned +15.19% vs +23.76% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ONOF annualized +10.07% vs +6.96% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, ONOF or VYM?

VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 14.2% for ONOF. Worst drawdown: ONOF -26.2% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both ONOF and VYM?

ONOF and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between ONOF and VYM?

ONOF and VYM share 192 common holdings with a 29.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 859 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, ONOF or VYM?

ONOF yields 1.23% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →