NUSB vs VOO
NUSB vs VOO
Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NUSB | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.17% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $156M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.29% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 167 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +1.80% | +13.31% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.72% | +24.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 0.7% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -0.4% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Nuveen | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Money Market | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 5, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
NUSB vs VOO Performance
Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF (NUSB) is a ETF from Nuveen and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NUSB returned +3.72% while VOO returned +24.01%. Year to date, NUSB is up 1.80% versus a gain of 13.31% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 0.7% for NUSB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -0.4% for NUSB and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.20. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NUSB charges 0.17% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $17 vs $3 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NUSB currently yields 4.29% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
NUSB and VOO share 0 holdings out of 597 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NUSB or VOO?
NUSB has an expense ratio of 0.17% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $14 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NUSB or VOO?
Over the past year NUSB returned +3.72% vs +24.01% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), NUSB annualized +4.88% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NUSB or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 0.7% for NUSB. Worst drawdown: NUSB -0.4% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both NUSB and VOO?
NUSB and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.20, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NUSB and VOO?
NUSB and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 597 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NUSB or VOO?
NUSB yields 4.29% while VOO yields 1.09%, so NUSB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.