NBFC vs SPY
NBFC vs SPY
Neuberger Berman Flexible Credit Income ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Quick Verdict
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 503 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NBFC | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $76M | $789.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.29% | 1.01% | |
| Holdings | 557 | 505 | |
| YTD Return | +1.34% | +9.93% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.43% | +19.50% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.33% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.82% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -4.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Neuberger Berman | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2024 | Jan 22, 1993 |
NBFC vs SPY Performance
Neuberger Berman Flexible Credit Income ETF (NBFC) is a ETF from Neuberger Berman and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year NBFC returned +5.43% while SPY returned +19.50%. Year to date, NBFC is up 1.34% versus a gain of 9.93% for SPY.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SPY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 3.4% for NBFC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.0% for NBFC and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NBFC charges 0.40% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $9 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NBFC currently yields 7.29% against 1.01% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
NBFC and SPY share 1 holdings out of 798 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NBFC | Weight in SPY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNP | 0.18% | 0.04% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NBFC or SPY?
NBFC has an expense ratio of 0.40% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $31 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NBFC or SPY?
Over the past year NBFC returned +5.43% vs +19.50% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), NBFC annualized +7.44% vs +8.74% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NBFC or SPY?
SPY has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 3.4% for NBFC. Worst drawdown: NBFC -4.0% vs SPY -56.5%.
Should I hold both NBFC and SPY?
NBFC and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NBFC and SPY?
NBFC and SPY share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 798 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NBFC or SPY?
NBFC yields 7.29% while SPY yields 1.01%, so NBFC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.