NANR vs VOO

Quick Verdict

VOO has a lower expense ratio. NANR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: NANRMore Diversified: VOO

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNANRVOOWinner
Expense Ratio0.35%0.03%
AUM$747M$979.0B
Dividend Yield1.87%1.09%
Holdings207509
YTD Return+16.94%+11.51%
1Y Return+42.04%+21.46%
3Y Return (annualized)+16.44%+20.86%
5Y Return (annualized)+17.43%+13.01%
Volatility (annualized)23.5%14.1%
Max Drawdown-51.1%-34.3%
Fund FamilySPDR State Street Global AdvisorsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionDec 15, 2015Sep 7, 2010

NANR vs VOO Performance

State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) is a ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NANR returned +42.04% while VOO returned +21.46%. Year to date, NANR is up 16.94% versus a gain of 11.51% for VOO.

Over three years, NANR compounded at +16.44% per year against +20.86% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +17.43% and +13.01% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.44% annualized vs +12.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

NANR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.5% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.1% for NANR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

NANR charges 0.35% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NANR currently yields 1.87% against 1.09% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

3.2%overlap

NANR and VOO share 30 holdings out of 689 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.2% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in NANRWeight in VOODifference
XOM10.06%0.88%9.18%
CVX6.53%0.48%6.05%
CTVA3.77%0.09%3.68%
NEMProProPro
COPProProPro
ADMProProPro
NUEProProPro
VLOProProPro
MPCProProPro
PSXProProPro
See all 10 holdings NANR shares with VOO
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, NANR or VOO?

NANR has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.

Which performed better, NANR or VOO?

Over the past year NANR returned +42.04% vs +21.46% for VOO, so NANR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), NANR annualized +12.85% vs +13.44% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, NANR or VOO?

NANR has been the more volatile fund at 23.5% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: NANR -51.1% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both NANR and VOO?

NANR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between NANR and VOO?

NANR and VOO share 30 common holdings with a 3.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 689 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, NANR or VOO?

NANR yields 1.87% while VOO yields 1.09%, so NANR currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →