MVV vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. MVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: MVVMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricMVVVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.95%0.04%
AUM$156M$79.0B
Dividend Yield0.65%2.86%
Holdings411568
YTD Return+27.86%+15.45%
1Y Return+42.17%+26.05%
3Y Return (annualized)+18.03%+17.96%
5Y Return (annualized)+7.86%+12.54%
Volatility (annualized)36.6%14.6%
Max Drawdown-86.3%-58.8%
Fund FamilyProSharesVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
InceptionJun 19, 2006Nov 10, 2006

MVV vs VYM Performance

ProShares Ultra MidCap400 (MVV) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MVV returned +42.17% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, MVV is up 27.86% versus a gain of 15.45% for VYM.

Over three years, MVV compounded at +18.03% per year against +17.96% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +7.86% and +12.54% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, MVV has the edge at +10.76% annualized vs +7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

MVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 36.6% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -86.3% for MVV and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

MVV charges 0.95% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $4 annually, a gap of $91 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MVV currently yields 0.65% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

3.8%overlap

MVV and VYM share 120 holdings out of 839 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.8% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in MVVWeight in VYMDifference
NVT:LN0.52%0.08%0.44%
RS0.39%0.07%0.32%
EWBC0.37%0.07%0.30%
DKSProProPro
DTMProProPro
OVVProProPro
RGAProProPro
WSOProProPro
RPMProProPro
EVRProProPro
See all 10 holdings MVV shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, MVV or VYM?

MVV has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $91 per year of difference.

Which performed better, MVV or VYM?

Over the past year MVV returned +42.17% vs +26.05% for VYM, so MVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), MVV annualized +10.76% vs +7.06% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, MVV or VYM?

MVV has been the more volatile fund at 36.6% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: MVV -86.3% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both MVV and VYM?

MVV and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between MVV and VYM?

MVV and VYM share 120 common holdings with a 3.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 839 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, MVV or VYM?

MVV yields 0.65% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →