MGF vs VOO
MGF vs VOO
Aberdeen Government Markets Income Fund vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MGF | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | - | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $99M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.50% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 456 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -1.59% | +13.11% | |
| 1Y Return | -1.08% | +22.88% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.83% | +21.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.18% | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.1% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -55.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | May 28, 1987 | Sep 7, 2010 |
MGF vs VOO Performance
Aberdeen Government Markets Income Fund (MGF) is a ETF from Aberdeen Asset Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MGF returned -1.08% while VOO returned +22.88%. Year to date, MGF is down 1.59% versus a gain of 13.11% for VOO.
Over three years, MGF compounded at +3.83% per year against +21.08% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -1.18% and +13.26% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.54% annualized vs -1.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 8.1% for MGF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -55.5% for MGF and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.27. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Holdings Overlap
MGF and VOO share 0 holdings out of 683 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which performed better, MGF or VOO?
Over the past year MGF returned -1.08% vs +22.88% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), MGF annualized -1.29% vs +13.54% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MGF or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 8.1% for MGF. Worst drawdown: MGF -55.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both MGF and VOO?
MGF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.27, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MGF and VOO?
MGF and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 683 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MGF or VOO?
MGF yields 7.50% while VOO yields 1.09%, so MGF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.