LSAF vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. LSAF delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: LSAFMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricLSAFVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.75%0.04%
AUM$123M$79.0B
Dividend Yield0.60%2.86%
Holdings102568
YTD Return+23.11%+15.80%
1Y Return+33.53%+26.12%
3Y Return (annualized)+20.14%+18.25%
5Y Return (annualized)+11.64%+12.51%
Volatility (annualized)19.3%14.6%
Max Drawdown-41.7%-58.8%
Fund FamilyLeaderSharesVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionOct 1, 2018Nov 10, 2006

LSAF vs VYM Performance

LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF (LSAF) is a ETF from LeaderShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LSAF returned +33.53% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, LSAF is up 23.11% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.

Over three years, LSAF compounded at +20.14% per year against +18.25% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +11.64% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, LSAF has the edge at +11.51% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

LSAF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.3% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -41.7% for LSAF and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

LSAF charges 0.75% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $4 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LSAF currently yields 0.60% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

4.0%overlap

LSAF and VYM share 33 holdings out of 625 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.0% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in LSAFWeight in VYMDifference
C1.05%0.81%0.24%
DELL1.44%0.21%1.23%
EBAY1.20%0.18%1.02%
TRVProProPro
AFLProProPro
MPCProProPro
VLOProProPro
RSProProPro
VIRTProProPro
AMPProProPro
See all 10 holdings LSAF shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, LSAF or VYM?

LSAF has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $71 per year of difference.

Which performed better, LSAF or VYM?

Over the past year LSAF returned +33.53% vs +26.12% for VYM, so LSAF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), LSAF annualized +11.51% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, LSAF or VYM?

LSAF has been the more volatile fund at 19.3% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: LSAF -41.7% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both LSAF and VYM?

LSAF and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between LSAF and VYM?

LSAF and VYM share 33 common holdings with a 4.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 625 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, LSAF or VYM?

LSAF yields 0.60% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →