LGH vs VOO

Quick Verdict

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOOMore Diversified: VOO

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricLGHVOOWinner
Expense Ratio1.00%0.03%
AUM$565M$979.0B
Dividend Yield0.37%1.09%
Holdings417509
YTD Return+7.96%+13.80%
1Y Return+19.54%+23.71%
3Y Return (annualized)+19.43%+21.50%
5Y Return (annualized)+10.37%+13.44%
Volatility (annualized)18.5%14.1%
Max Drawdown-29.6%-34.3%
Fund FamilyHoward Capital ManagementVanguard (US)
CategoryAllocation/BalancedEquity
InceptionOct 9, 2019Sep 7, 2010

LGH vs VOO Performance

HCM Defender 500 Index ETF (LGH) is a ETF from Howard Capital Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LGH returned +19.54% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, LGH is up 7.96% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.

Over three years, LGH compounded at +19.43% per year against +21.50% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +10.37% and +13.44% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, LGH has the edge at +15.81% annualized vs +13.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

LGH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.5% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.6% for LGH and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

LGH charges 1.00% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LGH currently yields 0.37% against 1.09% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

40.1%overlap

LGH and VOO share 393 holdings out of 527 unique holdings combined, representing a 40.1% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in LGHWeight in VOODifference
NVDA3.26%7.51%4.25%
AAPL2.93%6.59%3.66%
MSFT2.16%4.30%2.14%
AMZNProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
AVGOProProPro
GOOGProProPro
METAProProPro
TSLAProProPro
LLYProProPro
See all 10 holdings LGH shares with VOO
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, LGH or VOO?

LGH has an expense ratio of 1.00% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $97 per year of difference.

Which performed better, LGH or VOO?

Over the past year LGH returned +19.54% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), LGH annualized +15.81% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, LGH or VOO?

LGH has been the more volatile fund at 18.5% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: LGH -29.6% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both LGH and VOO?

LGH and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between LGH and VOO?

LGH and VOO share 393 common holdings with a 40.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 527 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, LGH or VOO?

LGH yields 0.37% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →