KDRN vs VOO
KDRN vs VOO
Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KDRN | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.57% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.33% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +1.21% | +13.31% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.51% | +24.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.34% | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.0% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Kingsbarn Capital Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 19, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
KDRN vs VOO Performance
Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF (KDRN) is a ETF from Kingsbarn Capital Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KDRN returned +2.51% while VOO returned +24.01%. Year to date, KDRN is up 1.21% versus a gain of 13.31% for VOO.
Over three years, KDRN compounded at +3.34% per year against +21.17% for VOO. Across the full 5-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.55% annualized vs +0.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 7.0% for KDRN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.3% for KDRN and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KDRN charges 0.57% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $57 vs $3 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KDRN currently yields 3.33% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
KDRN and VOO share 0 holdings out of 510 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KDRN or VOO?
KDRN has an expense ratio of 0.57% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $54 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KDRN or VOO?
Over the past year KDRN returned +2.51% vs +24.01% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), KDRN annualized +0.83% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KDRN or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 7.0% for KDRN. Worst drawdown: KDRN -15.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both KDRN and VOO?
KDRN and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KDRN and VOO?
KDRN and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 510 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KDRN or VOO?
KDRN yields 3.33% while VOO yields 1.09%, so KDRN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.