JHSC vs VOO
JHSC vs VOO
John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. JHSC delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JHSC | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.42% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $726M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.01% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 492 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +16.90% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.91% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.16% | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.42% | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.2% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -42.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | John Hancock Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 8, 2017 | Sep 7, 2010 |
JHSC vs VOO Performance
John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) is a ETF from John Hancock Investment Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year JHSC returned +26.91% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, JHSC is up 16.90% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Over three years, JHSC compounded at +14.16% per year against +21.50% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +8.42% and +13.44% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.58% annualized vs +8.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JHSC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.2% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.7% for JHSC and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JHSC charges 0.42% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $42 vs $3 annually, a gap of $39 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JHSC currently yields 1.01% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
JHSC and VOO share 0 holdings out of 990 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JHSC or VOO?
JHSC has an expense ratio of 0.42% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $39 per year of difference.
Which performed better, JHSC or VOO?
Over the past year JHSC returned +26.91% vs +23.71% for VOO, so JHSC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), JHSC annualized +8.83% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, JHSC or VOO?
JHSC has been the more volatile fund at 20.2% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: JHSC -42.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both JHSC and VOO?
JHSC and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between JHSC and VOO?
JHSC and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 990 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, JHSC or VOO?
JHSC yields 1.01% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.