IWB vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. IWB offers more diversification with 884 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMMore Diversified: IWB

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIWBVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.15%0.04%
AUM$47.8B$79.0B
Dividend Yield0.92%2.86%
Holdings1,029568
YTD Return+13.62%+15.80%
1Y Return+23.13%+26.12%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.12%+18.25%
5Y Return (annualized)+12.60%+12.51%
Volatility (annualized)15.3%14.6%
Max Drawdown-56.4%-58.8%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Nov 10, 2006

IWB vs VYM Performance

iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IWB returned +23.13% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, IWB is up 13.62% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.

Over three years, IWB compounded at +21.12% per year against +18.25% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +12.60% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, IWB has the edge at +7.14% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IWB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.4% for IWB and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IWB charges 0.15% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $4 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IWB currently yields 0.92% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

31.2%overlap

IWB and VYM share 303 holdings out of 1139 unique holdings combined, representing a 31.2% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IWBWeight in VYMDifference
AVGO2.49%6.47%3.98%
JPM:US1.29%3.36%2.07%
XOM0.81%2.83%2.02%
JNJProProPro
WMTProProPro
ABBVProProPro
PGProProPro
HDProProPro
CATProProPro
CSCOProProPro
See all 10 holdings IWB shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IWB or VYM?

IWB has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $11 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IWB or VYM?

Over the past year IWB returned +23.13% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), IWB annualized +7.14% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IWB or VYM?

IWB has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: IWB -56.4% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both IWB and VYM?

IWB and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between IWB and VYM?

IWB and VYM share 303 common holdings with a 31.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1139 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IWB or VYM?

IWB yields 0.92% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →