INCM vs IVV

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricINCMIVVWinner
Expense Ratio0.38%0.03%
AUM$1.7B$865.2B
Dividend Yield5.04%1.09%
Holdings357508
YTD Return+7.96%+13.52%
1Y Return+14.51%+23.63%
3Y Return (annualized)+11.36%+21.26%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.52%
Volatility (annualized)7.2%15.1%
Max Drawdown-7.8%-56.5%
Fund FamilyFranklin Templeton Investments (US)iShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryAllocation/BalancedEquity
InceptionJun 6, 2023May 15, 2000

INCM vs IVV Performance

Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year INCM returned +14.51% while IVV returned +23.63%. Year to date, INCM is up 7.96% versus a gain of 13.52% for IVV.

Over three years, INCM compounded at +11.36% per year against +21.26% for IVV. Across the full 3-year window we track, INCM has the edge at +10.98% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 7.2% for INCM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -7.8% for INCM and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

INCM charges 0.38% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $3 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, INCM currently yields 5.04% against 1.09% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

9.6%overlap

INCM and IVV share 45 holdings out of 718 unique holdings combined, representing a 9.6% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in INCMWeight in IVVDifference
MSFT0.16%4.57%4.41%
AMZN0.16%3.75%3.59%
XOM1.50%0.97%0.53%
PGProProPro
VZProProPro
CVXProProPro
PEPProProPro
JPMProProPro
DUKProProPro
KOProProPro
See all 10 holdings INCM shares with IVV
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, INCM or IVV?

INCM has an expense ratio of 0.38% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $35 per year of difference.

Which performed better, INCM or IVV?

Over the past year INCM returned +14.51% vs +23.63% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), INCM annualized +10.98% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, INCM or IVV?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 7.2% for INCM. Worst drawdown: INCM -7.8% vs IVV -56.5%.

Should I hold both INCM and IVV?

INCM and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between INCM and IVV?

INCM and IVV share 45 common holdings with a 9.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 718 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, INCM or IVV?

INCM yields 5.04% while IVV yields 1.09%, so INCM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →