IEFA vs IVV

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IEFA offers more diversification with 1463 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IEFA

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIEFAIVVWinner
Expense Ratio0.07%0.03%
AUM$187.0B$865.2B
Dividend Yield3.40%1.09%
Holdings2,645508
YTD Return+10.67%+13.13%
1Y Return+22.23%+22.90%
3Y Return (annualized)+16.91%+21.08%
5Y Return (annualized)+8.72%+13.27%
Volatility (annualized)14.3%15.1%
Max Drawdown-34.8%-56.5%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)iShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionOct 18, 2012May 15, 2000

IEFA vs IVV Performance

iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IEFA returned +22.23% while IVV returned +22.90%. Year to date, IEFA is up 10.67% versus a gain of 13.13% for IVV.

Over three years, IEFA compounded at +16.91% per year against +21.08% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +8.72% and +13.27% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, IEFA has the edge at +8.38% annualized vs +7.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.3% for IEFA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.8% for IEFA and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IEFA charges 0.07% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $7 vs $3 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IEFA currently yields 3.40% against 1.09% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

0.2%overlap

IEFA and IVV share 5 holdings out of 1963 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IEFAWeight in IVVDifference
ROP1.13%0.05%1.08%
DG0.27%0.04%0.23%
XTSLA0.01%0.15%0.14%
EQTProProPro
RFProProPro
See all 5 holdings IEFA shares with IVV
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IEFA or IVV?

IEFA has an expense ratio of 0.07% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $4 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IEFA or IVV?

Over the past year IEFA returned +22.23% vs +22.90% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), IEFA annualized +8.38% vs +7.02% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IEFA or IVV?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.3% for IEFA. Worst drawdown: IEFA -34.8% vs IVV -56.5%.

Should I hold both IEFA and IVV?

IEFA and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between IEFA and IVV?

IEFA and IVV share 5 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1963 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IEFA or IVV?

IEFA yields 3.40% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IEFA currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →