HFSI vs IVV
HFSI vs IVV
Hartford Strategic Income ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HFSI | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.0B | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.25% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 1,019 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -1.97% | +11.54% | |
| 1Y Return | +0.70% | +21.48% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.62% | +20.86% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.02% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Hartford Funds | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 21, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
HFSI vs IVV Performance
Hartford Strategic Income ETF (HFSI) is a ETF from Hartford Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year HFSI returned +0.70% while IVV returned +21.48%. Year to date, HFSI is down 1.97% versus a gain of 11.54% for IVV.
Over three years, HFSI compounded at +6.62% per year against +20.86% for IVV. Across the full 5-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.97% annualized vs +1.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 6.7% for HFSI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.3% for HFSI and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HFSI charges 0.49% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HFSI currently yields 5.25% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
HFSI and IVV share 7 holdings out of 860 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HFSI | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| C | 0.03% | 0.35% | 0.32% |
| NEE | 0.04% | 0.28% | 0.24% |
| ARES | 0.25% | 0.04% | 0.21% |
| KKR | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| PCG | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| BDX | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| APTV | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 7 holdings HFSI shares with IVV Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HFSI or IVV?
HFSI has an expense ratio of 0.49% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HFSI or IVV?
Over the past year HFSI returned +0.70% vs +21.48% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), HFSI annualized +1.74% vs +6.97% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HFSI or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 6.7% for HFSI. Worst drawdown: HFSI -19.3% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both HFSI and IVV?
HFSI and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HFSI and IVV?
HFSI and IVV share 7 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 860 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HFSI or IVV?
HFSI yields 5.25% while IVV yields 1.09%, so HFSI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.