GSC vs IVV
GSC vs IVV
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GSC delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GSC | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $284M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.13% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 99 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +24.28% | +13.31% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.85% | +24.00% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.16% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -27.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 3, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
GSC vs IVV Performance
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity ETF (GSC) is a ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GSC returned +32.85% while IVV returned +24.00%. Year to date, GSC is up 24.28% versus a gain of 13.31% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GSC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.0% for GSC and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GSC charges 0.75% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GSC currently yields 0.13% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
GSC and IVV share 1 holdings out of 601 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GSC | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRL | 0.89% | 0.02% | 0.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GSC or IVV?
GSC has an expense ratio of 0.75% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GSC or IVV?
Over the past year GSC returned +32.85% vs +24.00% for IVV, so GSC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), GSC annualized +21.61% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GSC or IVV?
GSC has been the more volatile fund at 18.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GSC -27.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both GSC and IVV?
GSC and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GSC and IVV?
GSC and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 601 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GSC or IVV?
GSC yields 0.13% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.