GDMA vs VOO

Quick Verdict

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOOMore Diversified: VOO

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGDMAVOOWinner
Expense Ratio0.75%0.03%
AUM$197M$979.0B
Dividend Yield2.48%1.09%
Holdings17509
YTD Return+9.42%+13.80%
1Y Return+19.57%+23.71%
3Y Return (annualized)+15.21%+21.50%
5Y Return (annualized)+8.04%+13.44%
Volatility (annualized)9.9%14.1%
Max Drawdown-16.7%-34.3%
Fund FamilyGadsden FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryAllocation/BalancedEquity
InceptionNov 14, 2018Sep 7, 2010

GDMA vs VOO Performance

Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA) is a ETF from Gadsden Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GDMA returned +19.57% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, GDMA is up 9.42% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.

Over three years, GDMA compounded at +15.21% per year against +21.50% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +8.04% and +13.44% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.58% annualized vs +9.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 9.9% for GDMA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.7% for GDMA and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GDMA charges 0.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GDMA currently yields 2.48% against 1.09% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

7.2%overlap

GDMA and VOO share 13 holdings out of 532 unique holdings combined, representing a 7.2% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in GDMAWeight in VOODifference
GOOG0.97%2.59%1.62%
MU1.06%2.02%0.96%
DELL2.83%0.19%2.64%
ORCLProProPro
INTCProProPro
LRCXProProPro
KLACProProPro
SNDKProProPro
STXProProPro
WDCProProPro
See all 10 holdings GDMA shares with VOO
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GDMA or VOO?

GDMA has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.

Which performed better, GDMA or VOO?

Over the past year GDMA returned +19.57% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), GDMA annualized +9.11% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, GDMA or VOO?

VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 9.9% for GDMA. Worst drawdown: GDMA -16.7% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both GDMA and VOO?

GDMA and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between GDMA and VOO?

GDMA and VOO share 13 common holdings with a 7.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 532 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, GDMA or VOO?

GDMA yields 2.48% while VOO yields 1.09%, so GDMA currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →