FTRB vs IVV
FTRB vs IVV
Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTRB | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $599M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.27% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 475 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -0.51% | +9.93% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.18% | +19.59% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.41% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.89% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -4.8% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Federated Hermes | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 2, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
FTRB vs IVV Performance
Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF (FTRB) is a ETF from Federated Hermes and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FTRB returned +3.18% while IVV returned +19.59%. Year to date, FTRB is down 0.51% versus a gain of 9.93% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 4.4% for FTRB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.8% for FTRB and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.33. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTRB charges 0.39% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTRB currently yields 4.27% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
FTRB and IVV share 0 holdings out of 910 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTRB or IVV?
FTRB has an expense ratio of 0.39% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FTRB or IVV?
Over the past year FTRB returned +3.18% vs +19.59% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), FTRB annualized +3.70% vs +6.91% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FTRB or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 4.4% for FTRB. Worst drawdown: FTRB -4.8% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both FTRB and IVV?
FTRB and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.33, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FTRB and IVV?
FTRB and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 910 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTRB or IVV?
FTRB yields 4.27% while IVV yields 1.09%, so FTRB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.