FT vs VYM

Quick Verdict

FT has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: FTHigher Returns: VYMMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFTVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.00%0.04%
AUM$212M$79.0B
Dividend Yield5.73%2.86%
Holdings704568
YTD Return+2.46%+15.57%
1Y Return+6.97%+25.99%
3Y Return (annualized)+12.50%+18.02%
5Y Return (annualized)+6.08%+12.71%
Volatility (annualized)15.5%14.6%
Max Drawdown-70.3%-58.8%
Fund FamilyFranklin Templeton Investments (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryAllocation/BalancedEquity
InceptionSep 23, 1988Nov 10, 2006

FT vs VYM Performance

Franklin Universal Trust (FT) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FT returned +6.97% while VYM returned +25.99%. Year to date, FT is up 2.46% versus a gain of 15.57% for VYM.

Over three years, FT compounded at +12.50% per year against +18.02% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +6.08% and +12.71% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs +0.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

FT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -70.3% for FT and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FT charges 0.00% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $0 vs $4 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FT currently yields 5.73% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

5.6%overlap

FT and VYM share 26 holdings out of 839 unique holdings combined, representing a 5.6% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FTWeight in VYMDifference
NEE4.74%0.86%3.88%
SRE3.81%0.28%3.53%
ETR2.82%0.21%2.61%
DUKProProPro
EVRGProProPro
LNTProProPro
SOProProPro
CNPProProPro
AEPProProPro
XELProProPro
See all 10 holdings FT shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FT or VYM?

FT has an expense ratio of 0.00% while VYM charges 0.04%. FT is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $4 per year of difference.

Which performed better, FT or VYM?

Over the past year FT returned +6.97% vs +25.99% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), FT annualized +0.79% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, FT or VYM?

FT has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: FT -70.3% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both FT and VYM?

FT and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between FT and VYM?

FT and VYM share 26 common holdings with a 5.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 839 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, FT or VYM?

FT yields 5.73% while VYM yields 2.86%, so FT currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →