FGSM vs IVV
FGSM vs IVV
Frontier Asset Global Small Cap Equity ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FGSM delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FGSM | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.82% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $50M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.28% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +18.80% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.79% | +23.70% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.49% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.43% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.7% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Frontier Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 19, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
FGSM vs IVV Performance
Frontier Asset Global Small Cap Equity ETF (FGSM) is a ETF from Frontier Asset Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FGSM returned +31.79% while IVV returned +23.70%. Year to date, FGSM is up 18.80% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 11.8% for FGSM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.7% for FGSM and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FGSM charges 0.82% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $82 vs $3 annually, a gap of $79 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FGSM currently yields 1.28% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
FGSM and IVV share 0 holdings out of 511 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FGSM or IVV?
FGSM has an expense ratio of 0.82% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $79 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FGSM or IVV?
Over the past year FGSM returned +31.79% vs +23.70% for IVV, so FGSM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FGSM annualized +26.02% vs +7.05% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FGSM or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 11.8% for FGSM. Worst drawdown: FGSM -17.7% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both FGSM and IVV?
FGSM and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FGSM and IVV?
FGSM and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 511 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FGSM or IVV?
FGSM yields 1.28% while IVV yields 1.09%, so FGSM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.