FFLV vs VYM
FFLV vs VYM
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. FFLV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFLV | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $16M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.41% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 119 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +16.27% | +13.24% | |
| 1Y Return | +30.05% | +23.76% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.97% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.7% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 9, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
FFLV vs VYM Performance
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FFLV returned +30.05% while VYM returned +23.76%. Year to date, FFLV is up 16.27% versus a gain of 13.24% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 12.5% for FFLV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.7% for FFLV and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFLV charges 0.38% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $4 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFLV currently yields 1.41% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
FFLV and VYM share 42 holdings out of 621 unique holdings combined, representing a 22.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FFLV | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOM | 3.48% | 2.83% | 0.65% |
| JNJ | 1.81% | 2.62% | 0.81% |
| CSCO | 2.38% | 1.39% | 0.99% |
| WFC | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| BAC | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| MRK | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| PG | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| KO | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| TRV | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| GILD | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 10 holdings FFLV shares with VYM Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFLV or VYM?
FFLV has an expense ratio of 0.38% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $34 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FFLV or VYM?
Over the past year FFLV returned +30.05% vs +23.76% for VYM, so FFLV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FFLV annualized +17.06% vs +6.96% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FFLV or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 12.5% for FFLV. Worst drawdown: FFLV -16.7% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both FFLV and VYM?
FFLV and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between FFLV and VYM?
FFLV and VYM share 42 common holdings with a 22.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 621 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFLV or VYM?
FFLV yields 1.41% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.