FFLG vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFFLGVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.38%0.04%
AUM$684M$79.0B
Dividend Yield0.13%2.86%
Holdings102568
YTD Return+11.54%+15.80%
1Y Return+20.08%+26.12%
3Y Return (annualized)+25.03%+18.25%
5Y Return (annualized)+9.71%+12.51%
Volatility (annualized)22.3%14.6%
Max Drawdown-44.6%-58.8%
Fund FamilyFidelity Investments (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionFeb 2, 2021Nov 10, 2006

FFLG vs VYM Performance

Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF (FFLG) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FFLG returned +20.08% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, FFLG is up 11.54% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.

Over three years, FFLG compounded at +25.03% per year against +18.25% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +9.71% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, FFLG has the edge at +9.83% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

FFLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.3% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.6% for FFLG and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FFLG charges 0.38% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $4 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFLG currently yields 0.13% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

7.4%overlap

FFLG and VYM share 14 holdings out of 642 unique holdings combined, representing a 7.4% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FFLGWeight in VYMDifference
AVGO2.98%6.47%3.49%
XOM0.29%2.83%2.54%
PG0.13%1.72%1.59%
BACProProPro
MSProProPro
GLWProProPro
UNHProProPro
LOWProProPro
GILDProProPro
STXProProPro
See all 10 holdings FFLG shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FFLG or VYM?

FFLG has an expense ratio of 0.38% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $34 per year of difference.

Which performed better, FFLG or VYM?

Over the past year FFLG returned +20.08% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), FFLG annualized +9.83% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, FFLG or VYM?

FFLG has been the more volatile fund at 22.3% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: FFLG -44.6% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both FFLG and VYM?

FFLG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between FFLG and VYM?

FFLG and VYM share 14 common holdings with a 7.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 642 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, FFLG or VYM?

FFLG yields 0.13% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →