FB vs IVV
FB vs IVV
ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FB | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 501 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +5.49% | +9.93% | |
| 1Y Return | +10.25% | +19.59% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.41% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.89% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -1.8% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
FB vs IVV Performance
ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETF (FB) is a ETF from ProShares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FB returned +10.25% while IVV returned +19.59%. Year to date, FB is up 5.49% versus a gain of 9.93% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 3.7% for FB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.8% for FB and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FB charges 0.58% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $3 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FB currently yields 2.00% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
FB and IVV share 485 holdings out of 519 unique holdings combined, representing a 93.5% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FB | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | 7.33% | 7.76% | 0.43% |
| AAPL | 7.11% | 7.44% | 0.33% |
| MSFT | 4.43% | 4.57% | 0.14% |
| AMZN | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| GOOGL | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| AVGO | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| GOOG | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| META | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| TSLA | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| MU | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 10 holdings FB shares with IVV Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FB or IVV?
FB has an expense ratio of 0.58% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FB or IVV?
Over the past year FB returned +10.25% vs +19.59% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), FB annualized +10.96% vs +6.91% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FB or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 3.7% for FB. Worst drawdown: FB -1.8% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both FB and IVV?
FB and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FB and IVV?
FB and IVV share 485 common holdings with a 93.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 519 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FB or IVV?
FB yields 2.00% while IVV yields 1.09%, so FB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.